Evergreen Enhancement

Case Analysis

“Richard Alpert, Senior Partner at Evergreen Investments must decide that promote his two best employees to the position of Executive VP. Initially he had Charlie Pace preferably about Daniel Faraday, but this decision was less clear when Alpert accidentally overhears an office conversation and learned that Pace took Adderall, a stimulant, primarily for people with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prescribed. Pace does not have ADHD and seemingly whether … Read More »

“Richard Alpert, Senior Partner at Evergreen Investments must decide that promote his two best employees to the position of Executive VP. Initially he had Charlie Pace preferably about Daniel Faraday, but this decision was less clear when Alpert accidentally overhears an office conversation and learned that Pace took Adderall, a stimulant, primarily for people with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prescribed. Pace does not have ADHD and apparently received the drug by deception, consult a doctor. Alpert is a series confronted by questions, including whether it is fair to Faraday or other powerful people in the carriage to the benefit of someone who illegally increased his power with a substance that he will not be passed medically needed. “
«Hide

from
Jared Harris,
Jenny Mead
Source: Darden School of Business
8 pages.
Release date: 30 August 2012. Prod #: UV6577-PDF-ENG
Evergreen Enhancement HBR case solution