What I find so interesting about The Firmwide 360-Degree Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley, is that it speaks to how the Human Resource department in this organization processes performance feedback and how that feedback is formulated. HR managers will give you candid reports on a number of factors, such as the question about why your performance is so low; however, they are not always clear on the rationale behind their comments.

I look forward to learning more about the Firmwide 360-degree process. In fact, I am already curious about what The Firmwide 360-degree includes. Let’s look at a very common evaluation process known as HR Case Study Analysis.

Recently, I attended a Human Resources symposium held by the Human Resources department of a M&A firm in Boston. At this meeting, it was presented as part of the Firmwide 360 Degree Performance Evaluation Process. Of course, the process is completely unnecessary. I thought I would see some kind of an HR Case Study Analysis.

The management team did not provide any guidelines on the process that they use for creating case studies. As a result, I took some notes on my own regarding some typical guidelines. Here are a few of the guidelines.

The management team should decide which case studies that they would like to have conducted. If they do not want a particular case study, they should let the employee know that they do not want to participate in the case study. The case study should be planned well in advance.

Each participant should be given specific goals on what they want to learn. They should be encouraged to write down these goals on a piece of paper.

Once all of the participants have written down their goals, they should be given examples of case study solutions that have worked for other employees in the past. Participants should be provided with the information necessary to evaluate whether or not this type of solution works for them. This information can come from the company’s training program, internet resources, and other sources.

Each case study should be monitored by the management team until the study is complete. At this point, the management team will determine what to do next with the case study, if anything.

The management team may choose to keep the case study or discard it; if the management team chooses to keep the case study, they should create a plan for conducting the case study and gather as much information as possible. The case study could last several hours or a few days, depending on the project’s scope.

At the conclusion of the case study, the management team should present to the entire team the results of the case study. This is important because everyone knows that case studies are a good way to make an employee feel that their input is valued. The management team should include any insights into why the case study was carried out in the first place.

Some case studies may not have enough information to reveal any clear results. This is why it is critical that the case study is completed well in advance of the actual performance evaluation process. The longer that it takes for the case study to conclude, the less opportunity the case study provides the management team for making judgments and making decisions about the employee’s future performance.

My colleagues and I would love to have had The Firmwide 360-degree case study analysis. The issue is, the case study was not developed by this management team. and I can’t say for sure whether the case study was developed to satisfy the HR manager’s curiosity, or if the case study was developed in order to provide insight into how the management process works in this organization.

[related_post themes="flat"]